|FULL LENGTH ARTICLE
|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 475-481
Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detection of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in central Ethiopia*
Zufan Bedewi Omer1, Yalemtsehay Mekonnen2, Adane Worku3, Aboma Zewde3, Girmay Medhin3, Temesgen Mohammed3, Rembert Pieper4, Gobena Ameni3
1 Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa; Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa; Department of Biology, College of Natural Science and Computational Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
2 Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
3 Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
4 J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
|Date of Web Publication||14-Feb-2017|
Zufan Bedewi Omer
Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective/Background: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is growing globally and becoming a major challenge for national TB control programs. Therefore, rapid identification of MDR strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and monitoring their transmission could contribute significantly to the control of TB. The GenoType MTBDRplus assay has been recommended by the World Health Organization to identify rifampicin (RIF)- and isoniazid (INH)-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates. This study was carried out to evaluate the performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for the detection of RIF- and INH-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates in central Ethiopia. Methods: A total of 279 M. Tuberculosis strains isolated from active TB cases in central Ethiopia were evaluated for their drug sensitivity by the conventional drug-susceptibility test (DST) and compared with data derived from the GenoType MTBDRplus assay. The DST served as the gold standard for evaluating the GenoType MTBDRplus assay. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for the detection of RIF-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates were 80.0% and 99.6%, respectively. Its sensitivity and specificity for the detection of INH-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates were 82.7% and 99.6%, respectively, whereas they were 75.0% and 100%, respectively, for the detection of MDR M. Tuberculosis strains. The concordances of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay and the conventional DST for the detection of RIF and INH susceptibility were 80% (8/10) and 86.2% (25/29), respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of the two tests for the detection of MDR M. Tuberculosis strains was 75%. Specific mutations were detected in 55.6% (5/9) of the RIF-resistant isolates, with the highest mutation rate (33.3%) for the rpoB gene (Codon S531L). For INH-resistant isolates, the highest mutation rate (88.8%) related to a katG mutation (Codon S315T1). Conclusion: The findings of this study revealed that the GenoType MTBDRplus assay has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of RIF and INH resistance. These preliminary data support the notion that the assay should be considered as an alternative to the DST for the characterization of MDR in M. Tuberculosis isolates and the control of TB.
Keywords: Drug-resistant tuberculosis, Gene mutation, GenoType MTBDRplus assay
|How to cite this article:|
Omer ZB, Mekonnen Y, Worku A, Zewde A, Medhin G, Mohammed T, Pieper R, Ameni G. Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detection of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in central Ethiopia*. Int J Mycobacteriol 2016;5:475-81
|How to cite this URL:|
Omer ZB, Mekonnen Y, Worku A, Zewde A, Medhin G, Mohammed T, Pieper R, Ameni G. Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detection of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in central Ethiopia*. Int J Mycobacteriol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Jan 19];5:475-81. Available from: https://www.ijmyco.org/text.asp?2016/5/4/475/200132
| Introduction|| |
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health problems, with high prevalence in developing countries. A major concern is multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), which is defined as the resistance to isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF), two therapeutic compounds for first-line TB treatment. The emergence of strains resistant to major anti-TB drugs has increased the need for identifying rapid and simple methods to detect such resistances and their molecular basis in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. Using such tests promises to improve the physician's decision to appropriately treat the disease in patients on an individual basis and allows better monitoring of the emergence of MDR-TB strains in distinct geographical regions, ultimately contributing to the prevention of the spread of resistant strains. Drug-susceptibility testing by conventional methods using solid media such as Löwenstein–Jensen is time consuming because M. Tuberculosis grows slowly in culture requiring several weeks to identify the pathogen and test its drug-resistance profile. Even with more automated fluid culture methods, the former method takes an average of 14 days. Two additional weeks are required to obtain information about the strain's drug susceptibility . Molecular methods for drug-resistance testing based on the identification of mutations in genes associated with drug resistance, such as the GenoType MTBDRplus assay, offer an effective, alternative method to determine drug-resistance strains . The GenoType MTBDRplus assay is a molecular-line probe assay containing probes specific for the M. Tuberculosis complex, wild type as well as probes for common RIF- and INH-resistance-conferring mutations. The assays are based on reverse hybridization of amplicons immobilized on membranes. The GenoType MTBDRplus assay detects mutations in the rpoB, katG, and inhA genes, and delivers results with a rapid turnaround time of 48–72 h. Nearly all RIF-resistant strains contain mutations in the rpoB gene, which encodes the RNA polymerase subunit β . Mutations in the katG and inhA genes are related to the high-level and low-level INH resistance, respectively . More than 95% of the RIF-resistant strains harbor a mutation within an 81-bp region of the rpoB gene from Codons 507 to 533 and this is region is called the RIF resistance-determining region ,,. The highest level of RIF resistance of the rpoB gene occurs in Codons 531 and 526. The rpoB gene mutations occur in Codons 511, 516, 518, 522, and 533 and cause low-level resistance to RIF. Resistance mutations are rarely identified in other regions of the rpoB gene .
Mutations causing INH resistance are located in several genes. Several studies have demonstrated that 34.6–94.3% of INH resistance is most frequently associated with a mutation in Codon 315 of the M. Tuberculosis catalase peroxidase (katG) gene ,. The inhA gene has 2.9–21.5% of its mutations in the promoter region , and an additional 2–11.5% in the ahpC–oxyR intergenic region ,.
Ethiopia is one of the 27 high MDR-TB-burden countries in the world. According to the 2015 World Health Organization report, 1.6% of new TB patients and 12.0% of previously treated patients had MDR-TB . Annually, 2000–2500 MDR-TB cases are estimated to occur among all reported pulmonary TB cases. However, for example, in the year 2012, only 212 (10.1%) TB cases were detected , indicating that the many of the expected MDR-TB cases remain undiagnosed and continue to spread in various communities. Therefore, improved monitoring of TB drug resistance”with respect to the time required for detection of resistance and the sensitivity and specificity of detection of MDR”is important, and may benefit from molecular tests such as the GenoType MTBDRplus assay. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus test in detecting INH- and RIF-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates in central Ethiopia.
| Materials and methods|| |
M. Tuberculosis isolates
A total of 279 M. Tuberculosis specimens isolated from smear-positive TB patients who visited St. Lukas, Atat, and Fitche hospitals in central Ethiopia between October 2012 and September 2013 were used for this study. The study was ethically approved by the Ethical Review Board of College of the Natural Sciences of the Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia (Ref. No. CNSDO/379/07/15).
Conventional drug-susceptibility testing using Löwenstein–Jensen media
The isolates were evaluated for their drug sensitivity using the conventional proportion method and the sensitivity of each isolate against the first-line drugs (INH, streptomycin, RIF, and ethambutol) was evaluated by the indirect proportion method on Löwenstein–Jensen medium, according to an international standard .
GenoType MTBDRplus assay
The GenoType MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions . The test is based on DNA strip technology and has three steps: DNA extraction, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, and reverse hybridization. The assay screens for the absence and/or presence of wild-type (WT) and/or mutant (MUT) DNA sequences within specific regions of three genes: the rpoB gene for RIF resistance, the katG gene for high-level INH resistance, and the inhA gene for low-level INH resistance. Each strip contains 27 reaction zones and the results can be obtained within a day . In brief, for one PCR, 10 μL amplification mix A containing 10× buffer, nucleotides, and DNA polymerase was mixed with 35 μL of amplification mix B containing MgCl2, the biotinylated primers, and dye. Then, 5 μL of M. Tuberculosis DNA was added to the mixture, making the final volume of PCR mix to be 50 μL. The PCRs consisted of 15 min of denaturing at 95 °C, followed by 10 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C and 120 s at 58 °C, followed by 20 additional cycles of 25 s at 95 °C, 40 s at 53 °C, and 40 s at 70 °C, with a final extension at 70 °C for 8 min. For hybridization, 20 μL of the amplification products were mixed with 20 μL of the denaturing reagent (provided with the kit) and denaturing was performed for 5 min in each of the plastic well. Thereafter, 1 mL of prewarmed hybridization buffer was added into each well and one strip was placed in each well. The hybridization was performed at 45 °C for 30 min, followed by two washing steps. For colorimetric detection of hybridized amplicons, streptavidin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase was added after which a substrate buffer was added. After final washing, strips were air dried and fixed on paper. The DNA of the standard strain H37Rv and molecular-grade water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.
Interpretation of results
Each strip consists of 27 reaction zones (bands) with six controls including conjugate control (CC), amplification control (AC), M. Tuberculosis complex, rpoB locus control, katG locus control, and inhA locus control. The remaining 21 reaction zones are WT and mutation reaction zones including eight rpoB WT and four MUT probes, one katG WT and two MUT probes, and two inhA WT and four MUT probes. Results were interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions . In brief, the presence of CC bands indicates the efficiency of the conjugate and substrate, the presence of AC bands indicates the efficiency of DNA extraction and PCR procedures, and the presence of the M. Tuberculosis complex band indicates that the tested bacterium belongs to the M. Tuberculosis complex. The three respective locus control bands (rpoB, katG, and inhA) indicate the presence of the specific gene region. The absence of the WT band is usually accompanied by the presence of MUT, which indicates resistance and the presence of all WT bands without the MUT band indicates susceptible isolate. In rare cases, lack of WT band(s) without a corresponding MUT band could be observed due to uncommon mutations in the probe region and the presence of both WT and MUT bands in the same stripe might be an indication for the presence of heteroresistance or mixed infection.
| Results|| |
Sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detection of RIF- and INH-resistant M. Tuberculosis
Drug-sensitivity test was conducted on 279 M. Tuberculosis isolates using the GenoType MTBDRplus assay and the Löwenstein–Jensen medium-based proportion method. The result of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay showed that most isolates (96.8%) were susceptible to RIF; by contrast, susceptibility to INH (91.0%) was lower than that of RIF ([Table 1]). The GenoType MTBDRplus assay detected nine (3.2%) RIF-resistant and 25 (9.0%) INH-resistant isolates. Moreover, three (1.1%) isolates were found to be MDR by the GenoType MTBDRplus assay.
|Table 1: Drug-susceptibility test result of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay (n = 279).|
Click here to view
The results of the evaluation of the performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay in detecting drug resistance are summarized in [Table 2]. The sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for the detection of RIF-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates were 80.0% and 99.6%, respectively. Its sensitivity and specificity for detecting INH-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates were 82.7% and 99.6%, respectively, whereas they were 75.0% and 100%, respectively, for detecting MDR M. Tuberculosis strains. The concordances of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay and the conventional DST for the detection of RIF and INH susceptibility were 80% (8/10) and 86.2% (25/29), respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of the two tests in detecting MDR M. Tuberculosis strains was 75%.
|Table 2: Performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay and the LJ medium-based proportion method as a gold standard for the detection of resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to rifampicin and isoniazid|
Click here to view
Mutation patterns of RIF and INH produced by the GenoType MTBDRplus assay
Specific mutation was detected in five of the nine RIF-resistant isolates. Of these five, three isolates had mutation at Codon S531L, whereas the remaining two isolates had mutation at Codon H526D. In the remaining four RIF-resistant isolates, WT8 probe was missing with no gain in MUT3 probes and considered “unknown.”
In the GenoType MTBDRplus assay, INH resistance was detected by using the probes of the katG and inhA genes. Of the 25 INH-resistant isolates, katG mutation occurred in 88.0% (22/25) of the isolates and in all of these isolates, specific mutations were observed at Codon S315T1 of the katG gene. Mutations in the inhA gene occurred only in three INH-resistant isolates. Specific inhA mutations were observed in two of the INH-resistant isolates, which had mutation at Codon C15T, whereas in the remaining one isolate, the inhA WT2 gene was missing without the presence of specific mutation band. These isolates are also considered unknown ([Table 3]).
Band patterns of drug-resistant M. Tuberculosis strains
The genotypic profile of resistance to RIF and NIH was examined. Of the nine isolates that showed resistance to RIF by the GenoType MTBDRplus assay, the missing of WT5 was observed in two isolates, but missing of WT8 was observed in seven isolates. MUT2A was observed in two RIF-resistant isolates and MUT3 was observed in three RIF-resistant isolates. In the remaining four isolates, WT8 was missing without the corresponding mutation of MUT3.
Of the 25 INH-resistance isolates, 88% (22/25) isolates had a high-level resistance profile to the drug, which indicated absence of WT band WT1 and presence of corresponding mutation bands of MUT1 in the katG gene. The remaining three isolates showed a low-level resistance pattern; WT1 was missing in two isolates and WT2 was missing in one isolate of the inhA gene in INH resistance, and there was a corresponding mutation in MUT1 in two isolates of the inhA regulatory region ([Figure 1]).
|Figure 1: Representative DNA patterns obtained by the GenoType MTBDRplus assay. Lane 1, water as a negative control, Lanes 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 all are examples of a pattern of RIFs and INHs; Lane 4, example of a pattern of RIFr and INHr; Lane 5, example of a pattern of RIFs and INHr with katG mutation; Lane 7 is an example of a pattern of RIFs and INHr with inhA mutation; Lane 16, H37Rv as a positive control. INH, isoniazid; RIF, rifampicin. Note: The superscript ‘r’ represent resistance and ‘s’ represent sensitive.|
Click here to view
The band patterns of isolates resistant to RIF and INH were observed in six of the RIF mono-resistant, 22 of the INH mono-resistant, and three MDR isolates. In the rpoB gene, the absence of WT5 was observed in two RIF mono-resistant isolates and there was a corresponding MUT2A in these two RIF mono-resistant isolates. The absence of WT8 was observed in four RIF mono-resistant isolates and in all of the three MDR isolates. The corresponding MUT3 was observed in only one RIF mono-resistant and in two MDR isolates. In the remaining four RIF-resistant isolates, WT8 probe was missing with no gain in MUT3 probes ([Table 4]).
|Table 4: Band patterns of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains using the GenoType MTBDRplus assay|
Click here to view
In the case of INH-resistant strains, in the katG gene, the missing WT1 was observed in 19/22 (86.4%) of the INH mono-resistant isolates and in all of the three MDR isolates ([Table 4]). The corresponding katG MUT1 was observed in all of these 19 INH mono-resistant isolates and in all of the three MDR isolates. In the case of the inhA gene, the absence of WT1 was observed in only two isolates and there was a presence of the corresponding MUT1 in these two INH mono-resistant isolates. In the same inhA gene, WT2 was missing in one INH mono-resistant isolate without the presence of the corresponding mutation gene.
| Discussion|| |
In this study, the performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for the detection of RIF- and or INH-resistant strains of M. Tuberculosis was evaluated on 279 M. Tuberculosis isolates, which were isolated from pulmonary TB patients at three towns and their surroundings in central Ethiopia. We observed that the GenoType MTBDRplus assay results had a good concordance with the conventional DST with additional advantage of a shorter turnaround time. The sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for detection of RIF- and INH-resistant M. Tuberculosis isolates were very good. The overall concordance of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay and the conventional DST method was 88.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay were 80.0% and 99.6%, respectively, for the detection of RIF resistance. Moreover, they were 82.7% and 99.6%, respectively, for the detection of INH resistance. The result of another study conducted in northwest Ethiopia reported sensitivity and specificity of 92.0% and 99.0%, respectively, for the detection of INH resistance, whereas both sensitivity and specificity for the detection of RIF resistance were 100% . A study in India reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 97.6%, 94.4%, 97.6%, and 94.4%, respectively, for the detection of RIF resistance, but the same study reported sensitivity and specificity values of 83.3% and 93.8%, respectively, for the detection of INH resistance . Studies in Uganda and France , reported sensitivity of 100% for the detection of RIF resistance.
In this study, the GenoType MTBDRplus assay identified RIF-resistance-specific mutation by rpoB MUT probes, which was detected in five of the nine RIF-resistant isolates. Higher specific mutation on the rpoB gene was reported in another study in India  and in South Africa .
The result of this study showed that of the five specific mutations of the rpoB gene, three had mutations at Codon S531L. The remaining 22.2% (2/9) had mutation at Codon H526D. A similar finding was reported by a study conducted in India . In four of the nine RIF-resistant isolates, WT8 probe was missing with no gain in MUT3 probes, which indicated the presence of a less common or rare mutation. Similarly, RIF-resistant isolates with the missing of WT8 probe without any MUT band were reported in other studies from New Delhi, France and Vietnam ,,. Another study conducted in northwest Ethiopia reported that all phenotypically defined RIF-resistant strains and MDR strains had mutations conferring resistance to RIF and INH (i.e., MDR).
In this study, the frequency of mutation at Codon S531L occurred more in two of the three MDR strains and in one of the six RIF mono-resistant strains. However, higher frequency of mutation at Codon S531L was reported from India and South Africa in MDR and RIF mono-resistant strains ,.
In the GenoType MTBDRplus assay, resistance to INH is detected by probes of the katG and inhA genes. The higher frequency of resistance to INH occurred due to mutation of the katG gene, whereas lower frequency of resistance was caused by the mutations in the promoter region of the inhA gene . Of the 25 INH-resistant isolates, katG mutation occurred in 88% (22/25) of the isolates. In all of these 22 isolates, specific mutations were found at Codon S315T1 of the katG gene, which was also reported by other studies conducted in northwest Ethiopia  and India . Some studies reported lower frequencies of mutation in the katG gene at Codon S315T1 from Uganda, France, and South Africa ,,.
Mutations in the inhA gene occurred in only three of the 25 INH-resistant isolates, which is similar to the frequency of inhA mutation reported from the northwest part of Ethiopia . Compared with these findings, a study from North India reported the occurrence of low frequency of INH-resistance mutation in the inhA gene . In contrast to these findings, higher inhA gene mutation was reported from Tunisia  and Canada . Specific inhA mutations were found in two of the three INH-resistant isolates, which had mutation in Codon C15T, but in the remaining one isolate, the inhA WT2 gene was missing without the presence of a specific mutation band. In this study, four of the phenotypically defined INH-resistant strains had no mutations in the katG and inhA genes. This could suggest that there may be other mutations in other codons of the katG and inhA genes or the presence of some unidentified mutations in other genomic regions such as ahpC, kasA, and furA.
In conclusion, the findings of this study revealed that the GenoType MTBDRplus assay has high sensitivities and specificities for detecting RIF- and INH-resistant, and MDR M. Tuberculosis isolates, suggesting the potential role of this assay for the control of TB in Ethiopia and other countries.
| Conflicts of interest|| |
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This study was jointly funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH, USA) through its H3Africa Consortium Program (Grant Ref. No. U01HG007472-01), Addis Ababa University through its Thematic Research Program, and Hawassa University. We would like to thank the staff members of the TB laboratory at St. Lukas, Atat, and Fiche Hospitals without whom this study could not have been completed.
| References|| |
S. Ahmad, E. Mokaddas, Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, Respir. Med. 103 (2009) 177–179.
P. Ioannidis, D. Papaventsis, S. Karabela, et al, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
detection and rifampin resistance identification in patients with substantial clinical indications of tuberculosis and smear-negative microscopy results, J. Clin. Microbiol. 49 (2011) 3068–3070.
D. Hilleman, S. Rusch-Gerdes, E. Richter, Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus
assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
strains and clinical specimens, J. Clin. Microbiol. 45 (2007) 2635–2640.
V. Kapur, L.L. Li, S. Iordanescu, et al, Characterization by automated DNA sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpoB
) encoding the RNA polymerase beta subunit in rifampinresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
strains from New York City and Texas, J. Clin. Microbiol. 32 (1994) 1095–1098.
A. Telenti, N. Honore, C. Bernasconi, et al, Genotypic assessment of isoniazid and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
: a blind study at reference laboratory level, J. Clin. Microbiol. 35 (1997) 719–723.
A. Telenti, P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, et al, Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
, Lancet 341 (1993) 647–650.
A. Rattan, A. Kalia, N. Ahmad, Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
: molecular perspectives, Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4 (1998) 195–209.
D. Hillemann, M. Weizenegger, T. Kubica, et al, Use of the genotype MTBDR assay for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex isolates, J. Clin. Microbiol. 43 (2005) 3699.
S.Y. Kim, Y.J. Park, W.I. Kim, et al, Molecular analysis of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates recovered from South Korea, Diagn, Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 47 (2003) 497–502.
V. Nikolayevsky, T. Brown, Y. Balabanova, et al, Detection of mutations associated with isoniazid and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from Samara Region, Russian Federation, J. Clin. Microbiol. 42 (2004) 4498–4502.
M. Zhang, J. Yue, Y.P. Yang, et al, Detection of mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from China, J. Clin. Microbiol. 43 (2005) 5477–5482.
World Health Organization, WHO Global Tuberculosis Report 2015, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
Federal Ministry of Health, Implementation Guideline for GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay in Ethiopia, Ethiopia FMOH, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2014.
P. Kent, G. Kubica, Public Health Mycobacteriology, A Guide for the Level III Laboratory, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, 1985.
B. Tessema, J. Beer, F. Emmrich, et al, Analysis of gene mutations associated with isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from Ethiopia, BMC Infect. Dis. 12 (2012) 37.
R. Singhal, J. Arora, P. Lal, et al, Comparison of line probe assay with liquid culture for rapid detection of multi-drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
, Indian J. Med. Res. 136 (2012) 1044–1047.
H. Albert, F.B. Wanga, S. Mukkada, et al, Rapid screening of MDR-TB using molecular line probe assay is feasible in Uganda, BMC Infect. Dis. 10 (2010) 41.
F. Brossier, N. Veziris, C.T. Pernot, et al, Performance of the GenoType MTBDR line probe assay for detection of resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid in strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
with low and high level resistance, J. Clin. Microbiol. 44 (2006) 3659–3664.
S. Singhal, V.P. Myneedu, J. Arora, et al, Early detection of multi-drug resistance and common mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from Delhi using GenoType MTBDRplus
assay, Indian J. Med. Res. 33 (2015) 46– 52.
M. Barnard, H. Albert, G. Coetzee, et al, Rapid molecular screening for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in a highvolume public health laboratory in South Africa, Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 177 (2008) 787–792.
N.Y. Raj, B.K. Singh, S.K. Sharma, et al, Comparative evaluation of GenoType MTBDRplus
line probe assay with solid culture method in early diagnosis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) at a tertiary care centre in India, PLoS One 8 (2013) e72036.
M.N. Huyen, E.W. Tiemersma, N.T. Lan, et al, Validation of the GenoType MTBDRplus
assay for diagnosis of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in South Vietnam, BMC Infect. Dis. 10 (2010) 149.
Y. Zhang, W.W. Yew, Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
, Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 13 (2009) 1320–1330.
A. Soudani, S. Hadjfredj, M. Zribi, et al, Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Tunisian isoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
strains, J. Microbiol. 49 (2011) 413.
S. Bolotin, D.C. Alexander, P. Chedore, et al, Molecular characterization of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
isolates from Ontario, Canada, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64 (2009) 263–266.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Prevalence of drug resistance-conferring mutations associated with isoniazid and rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Melese Abate Reta,Birhan Alemnew,Biruk Beletew Abate,P Bernard Fourie |
| ||Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Phenotypic and genotypic drug sensitivity profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and associated factors in northeastern Ethiopia
| ||Fikru Gashaw,Berhanu Erko,Yalemtsehay Mekonnen,Bazezew Yenew,Misikir Amare,Balako Gumi,Gobena Ameni |
| ||BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Epidemiology of first and second-line drug-resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex common species: Evidence from selected TB treatment initiating centers in Ethiopia
| ||Biniyam Dagne,Kassu Desta,Rahel Fekade,Misikir Amare,Mengistu Tadesse,Getu Diriba,Betselot Zerihun,Melak Getu,Waganeh Sinshaw,Getachew Seid,Dinka Fekadu Gamtesa,Gebeyehu Assefa,Ayinalem Alemu,Seyed Ehtesham Hasnain |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(1): e0245687 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Magnitude of Phenotypic and MTBDRplus Line Probe Assay First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Among Tuberculosis Patients; Northwest Ethiopia
| ||Wubet Birhan Yigzaw,Jordi B Torrelles,Shu-Hua Wang,Belay Tessema |
| ||Infection and Drug Resistance. 2021; Volume 14: 497 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Drug Resistance Conferring Mutation and Genetic Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis Patients; Ethiopia
| ||Sosina Ayalew,Teklu Wegayehu,Hawult Taye,Liya Wassie,Selfu Girma,Stefan Berg,Adane Mihret |
| ||Infection and Drug Resistance. 2021; Volume 14: 575 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Structural Basis for Inhibition of Enoyl-[Acyl Carrier Protein] Reductase (InhA) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
| ||Maurício Boff de Ávila,Gabriela Bitencourt-Ferreira,Walter Filgueira de Azevedo |
| ||Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2020; 27(5): 745 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Evaluation of the QuantaMatrix Multiplexed Assay Platform for Molecular Diagnosis of Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Using Clinical Strains Isolated in Myanmar
| ||Yunhee Chang,Seoyong Kim,Yeun Kim,Phyu Win Ei,Dasom Hwang,Jongseok Lee,Chulhun L Chang,Hyeyoung Lee |
| ||Annals of Laboratory Medicine. 2020; 40(2): 142 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Systematic Review of Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance Points to Continuing Evolution and Subsequent Evasion of Molecular Detection, and Potential for Emergence of Multidrug Resistance in Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
| ||Siavash J. Valafar |
| ||Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2020; 65(3) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Spoligotyping and drug sensitivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in the Arsi Zone of southeastern Ethiopia
| ||B. Haile,K. Tafess,A. Zewude,B. Yenew,G. Siu,G. Ameni |
| ||New Microbes and New Infections. 2020; 33: 100620 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Molecular Epidemiology, Diagnostics and Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Africa: A Systematic Review of Current Reports
| ||John Osei Sekyere,Melese Abate Reta,Nontuthuko Excellent Maningi,Petrus Bernard Fourie |
| ||Journal of Infection. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Genetic diversity and drug susceptibility profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis obtained from Saint Peter’s TB specialized Hospital, Ethiopia
| ||Delesa Damena,Samuel Tolosa,Milkessa Hailemariam,Aboma Zewude,Adane Worku,Biruk Mekonnen,Temesgen Mohammed,Addisu Admasu,Emile R. Chimusa,Adane Mihret,Tamrat Abebe,Gobena Ameni,Hasnain Seyed Ehtesham |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(6): e0218545 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Molecular detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensitivity to rifampicin and isoniazid in South Gondar Zone, northwest Ethiopia
| ||Amir Alelign,Aboma Zewude,Temesgen Mohammed,Samuel Tolosa,Gobena Ameni,Beyene Petros |
| ||BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019; 19(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The role of epigenetics, bacterial and host factors in progression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
| ||Musa Marimani,Aijaz Ahmad,Adriano Duse |
| ||Tuberculosis. 2018; 113: 200 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Use of Genotype MTBDRplus Assay for Diagnosis of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Nepal
| ||Elina Maharjan,Narayan Dutt Pant,Sanjeev Neupane,Jyoti Amatya,Bhawana Shrestha |
| ||International Scholarly Research Notices. 2017; 2017: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|